Page 141 of 141

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Tue 08, 2017 6:26 pm
by Mac66
I'm sure the conservative Christians who voted for Donny are thrilled by the groper's choice of foul mouthed minions he keeps hiring to tell him what to do...

Always back to HC with you guys? You won't, can't let go... She's irrelevant now, but you keep trying to do the moral and political resurrection..tell it to Sean the suck up, whilst you may...that revolving door at Foxy News is moving right quick...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Tue 08, 2017 7:04 pm
by JIMD
Looks like your stuck in the past as well

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Tue 08, 2017 8:06 pm
by specialties
I'm sure the conservative Christians who voted for Donny are thrilled by the groper's choice of foul mouthed minions he keeps hiring to tell him what to do...
:lol: :lol: :lol: Ahhh shucks, the gift that keeps on giving is back... Nice example, mushy... :lol:
Who gropes best other than an impeached former president with a real cranked out mama...
If she was at the wheel now the entire country would have come off the rails when she found out that the old dictator schtick isn't for US...
Trust me, she could not have handled it...
That was a very close call and a good wake up for everyone to be thankful for...
And be very thankful that the good guys won this time around and that we are not sore winners...

Are you kidding?? It was bedrock down home Christians who bailed us all out... Yule see... screw your state god...

Refugees: We need to remind ourselves of cancerous type people who wander through the world seeking the rule of soul...
If we don't remember her and her putrid ilk then we must review marx, stalin, hitler, pot, mao, all over again, you know, the usual suspects...

She was just another bag in waiting ( with lotsa millions and a few e-mails )...
Way too much corrupt and hagged out for real people who LOVE freedom... YUK, I still gag...

It's OK, at least you do not have to believe or beat your wife... It's your soul, Shadrack!!

Marx is dead, forever live our King!!!

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Tue 08, 2017 8:48 pm
by Mac66
All you wanted was anyone not named hilary. You got conned. Could have done so much better...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Wed 09, 2017 7:41 am
by Vlad_Rap
You got conned.
Do you know why you resort to this kind of unsupported garbage so often? Its easy.

To say, "You got conned", into voting for Trump is to imply you can read the minds of Trump voters. Who do you think you are - Bobkat? The other thing is you are trying to claim you have the beginning of an idea of what motivates patriotic voters. You have proven here beyond the shadow of a doubt that you do not. Your just here to force the false narrative . Otherwise you would be able to present some sort of coherent line of argument.

Democrats stand for nothing. They figure just get rid of Trump and every weird liberal agenda they promote will just magically fall into place. You were the ones who were conned.

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Wed 09, 2017 8:07 am
by Mac66
read the minds of Trump voters.
Good point. Impossible.

Trump voters: ignored by Washington, and when not ignored, despised the intrusion of big gov into their lives. Left behind by the recovery. Jobs lost to foreign competitors. A social agenda driven by left wing easterners who have no clue. Porous borders; jobs taken by unskilled workers willing to work for less. A loss of standing in the world. Crime out of control. 2nd amendment under threat. A supreme court in jeopardy. Obama hatred.

That enough?

You got conned by an amateur populist who spoke to all of this and more. He's not a conservative. You could have had Fiorina, Cruz, Bush, Kasich. You put a family of self-serving amateurs in the WH. Do you actually dispute that?

HC was a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign. The Dems are in very bad shape.They do lack a message. Pelosi, Reid, Shultz: awful. The bench is old and thin.

You won. Got it. Le's see how his threats play with the madman.

I want tax reform, vocational based job creation, support for small businesses, and immigration reform, resolution of Iraq and Afghanistan. Where has he delivered? Where has he indicated he has the inkling of a clue?

He said yes to Gorsuch, and is packing the lower courts with conservatives. His legacy is there.

You can worship him all you want. I think he's dangerously inept.

Not good enough explainer for you? Could care less.

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Wed 09, 2017 8:54 am
by JIMD
You could have had Fiorina, Cruz, Bush, Kasich. Hillary may have beaten those people so were OK with the outcome.

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Wed 09, 2017 9:15 am
by Mac66
Hillary may have beaten
Doubt if she could have beaten Cheetah. She's run two terrible, disorganized campaigns, full of infighting and turmoil.

Kind of like the Trump WH-

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Aug Thu 10, 2017 9:57 am
by HokieAl
Ooops. NYT's bad. Honest mistake right.
New York Times guilty of large screw-up on climate-change story
That correction, which sits at the foot of the story, dutifully straightens out the record. Yet given the magnitude of the screw-up, it should sit atop the story, surrounded by red flashing lights and perhaps an audio track to instruct readers: Warning: This story once peddled a faulty and damaging premise.
That premise suggests that the Trump administration is stifling a damaging draft report
Of course it did. It's all about making stuff up to injure our President.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/er ... e48947c17c

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Fri 13, 2017 2:55 pm
by JIMD

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Sat 14, 2017 4:59 am
by specialties
Please we beseech mushy, bobkat and the bridgeless to give us the straight skinny info, updates and any consolations which they might afford us???

What does all of this mean in their spiritless society?? Why the pogrom on America?? We are puckered...
Image

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Sat 14, 2017 10:54 am
by Mac66
https://www.popsci.com/nasa-data-sea-le ... ate-change
People sharing this false finding usually include some version of the above graph, which shows NASA satellite data on sea level rise. It can leave one with the impression that sea level is declining. But that’s only because it takes a small amount of data out of context. If you zoom out, you see that the above dip isn't the result of a decline—it’s just natural variation, which happens with all sorts of phenomena.

To confirm this PopSci emailed Tapio Schneider a climate scientist at Caltech who works with the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (who puts up the data).

"For example, some winters, more snow accumulates on continents than usual," Tapio Schneider told PopSci via email. "When that happens, water that otherwise would be in the oceans is locked on land, until it thaws and flows back into the oceans. Or, temperature fluctuations lead to temporary warming or cooling of ocean waters. Because water expands as it warms, warming raises sea level (and cooling lowers it)—even when that warming or cooling is temporary."

So within a long-term trend of sea level rise, Schneider explained, you're bound to see short-term fluctuations.

"It would be a mistake to try to infer any climate trend from a few years of data," he said. Sea level for the past year or two seems relatively flat, based on satellite measurements, but records show a gradual increase stretching back to at least 1870. In fact, Schneider added, the sea level curve in the past couple of years is probably just the result of especially high levels in 2015. A strong El Niño—a natural climate fluctuation that makes certain years particularly hot—bumped sea levels up temporarily.

"When one looks at trends over decades, it is clear that sea level is inexorably rising," Schneider said. "We expect that long-term trend to continue as long as the climate warms—both because warming waters expand and because melting land ice contributes to sea level rise."

In other words, wishing a thing doesn’t make it so. The seas are still rising, the Great Barrier Reef is still bleaching, the polar ice caps are still melting, and as our streak of record-breaking global temperatures shows, climate change is still happening.

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Sat 14, 2017 11:09 am
by specialties
:lol: Oh sure!!! Despite decades of REAL research that says you're full of garbonzo beans... Clear the decks, he's a real live one now!!

You wanna lose the penguins, they vote you know?? Nice guy!! Penguins were not a threat until now... Y'all will sacrifice anyone or anything...

Your lateral arabesque is in front of you.... Go 100% demand oxygen for a while, then see...

And we know about this too:

http://www.radiocom.net/vx6/pentrax.htm
http://www.radiocom.net/vx6/penpro.htm

Any more fake news from the continent before we shut down 3ZB 4YA, and NGX?? You can't even lie from there and get away with it...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Sat 14, 2017 11:23 am
by Mac66
You're right. Caltech is on a par with MIT; how stupid to trust the findings of a climate scientist when you can put your faith in a right wing amateur with an agenda.

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Oct Sat 14, 2017 7:18 pm
by specialties
:lol: Rave on, it don't change the truth none!!

So what will you do to save the penguins?? Ignore them like your 55,000 abortions... Ohh, and all that empathy!!

clue: Text without context is simply pretext...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Dec Sat 23, 2017 2:32 pm
by JIMD
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest ... earth-2019

that's a 180, The most dogma believing fools will say the climate is cooling directly becuase of global warming, you can't argue with that

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Dec Tue 26, 2017 8:07 am
by Vlad_Rap
Woah!.....Who knew?
If people aren’t concerned enough about the problems of climate change, what could be better than the threat of a zombie apocalypse?
http://nautil.us/blog/-heres-how-to-mak ... xtra-scary
But what if these defrosting virus turn out to create zombies who are smarter than snowflakes? Not really such a long shot. Wouldn't that be a good deal?

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
by Mac66
What is the current whine about climate change?

That Gore is making money from his book?

That every CEO with a brain is preparing his/her business to deal with the economic impact?

That renewable energy jobs now outnumber coal jobs?

That coastal communities around the globe are under threat from rising sea levels?

That Donny didn’t get out of Paris fast enough?

That not enough polar bears are starving to death?

That the oceans are not really warming up?

That it’s not really a Chinese hoax?

That coral reefs are not dying? Pretty important, but whatever.

The whining from the right is so constant and muddy it’s just hard to know the current state of complaint...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Dec Tue 26, 2017 10:29 am
by specialties
No, it's just the same old schtuffs that isn't anything to do with real... That covers it...

U been Trumped, boy!!! Have a nice Boxing Day, mushybridge...

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Dec Tue 26, 2017 5:57 pm
by HokieAl
Mac66 wrote:
Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
What is the current whine about climate change?



That every CEO with a brain is preparing his/her business to deal with the economic impact?
The economic impact is due to taxes, fees, and other government imposed punitive actions.
Mac66 wrote:
Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
That renewable energy jobs now outnumber coal jobs?
Coal is expensive. Many plants are being converted to natural gas. Solar and wind is still feel-good nonsense.
Mac66 wrote:
Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
That coastal communities around the globe are under threat from rising sea levels?
They're under threat from erosion and storms as they've always been. It's not different now, and it's no worse.
Mac66 wrote:
Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
That not enough polar bears are starving to death?
Isn't that population at record levels?
Mac66 wrote:
Dec Tue 26, 2017 9:15 am
That the oceans are not really warming up?
Are they?

Re: The "Global Warming" Debates-a.k.a. "Arguing with Idiots"

Posted: Feb Fri 09, 2018 11:39 am
by JIMD